http://www.radicalhistory.net/index.htmlDan's radical history blogendan@radicalhistory.netCopyright 2010 Dan Allosso2010-03-27T15:09:39-04:00 hourly 1 2000-01-01T12:00+00:00 Sat, 27 Mar 2010 15:15:48 -0400dan@radicalhistory.netNone2010-03-27T15:09:39-04:00http://www.radicalhistory.net/files/253f7d9f6655d700b7588b700ac2d914-3.html#unique-entry-id-3http://www.radicalhistory.net/files/253f7d9f6655d700b7588b700ac2d914-3.html#unique-entry-id-3Read a little book written in 1984 by Joyce Appleby called Capitalism and a New Social Order: The Republican Vision of the 1790s. My notes on it turned into a bit of a reflection on economics; which is fair, I think, because she basically says the Jeffersonians were the true laissez faire libertarians. Which makes them the progenitors of the Reagan Republicans. Hmmm.

My complete notes here.
]]>dan@radicalhistory.netNone2010-03-09T21:34:15-05:00http://www.radicalhistory.net/files/e861a7b55f99256f4c34d052b3cc6642-2.html#unique-entry-id-2http://www.radicalhistory.net/files/e861a7b55f99256f4c34d052b3cc6642-2.html#unique-entry-id-2Peter Linebaugh and Marcus Rediker
The Many-Headed Hydra: Sailors, Slaves, Commoners, and the Hidden History of the Revolutionary Atlantic
2000

This book rocks! I’ve been spending a lot of time researching my own stuff, and I was beginning to feel bad about letting the field reading slide a little. Especially the radical stuff. I half-reluctantly grabbed this from the bottom of the pile on my shelf, thinking I’d give it a day and jump-start this reading.

A day and a half later, I’m thinking I need to break my rule and buy this book. And I think I need to borrow some of these characters -- many of whom I've never heard of before! -- for fiction in the future. Click the title for my notes on the book.]]>dan@radicalhistory.netNone2010-03-09T20:55:46-05:00http://www.radicalhistory.net/files/35d3c69cae2181ff8fbfb3f6de68f99b-1.html#unique-entry-id-1http://www.radicalhistory.net/files/35d3c69cae2181ff8fbfb3f6de68f99b-1.html#unique-entry-id-1Charles Knowlton M.D. (1800-1850), author of The Fruits of Philosophy. Jailed, fined, and harrassed for blasphemy, because he wrote the first American birth control book.

Charles Bradlaugh (1833-1891), prosecuted for blasphemy because he republishing Knowlton's book.





]]>dan@radicalhistory.netNone2010-03-01T20:38:14-05:00http://www.radicalhistory.net/files/e190efd7cbd7dc606a84bca7481bde88-0.html#unique-entry-id-0http://www.radicalhistory.net/files/e190efd7cbd7dc606a84bca7481bde88-0.html#unique-entry-id-0What is radicalhistory.net?

I'm reading for PhD fields in 18th and 19th century British and 19th and 20th century American social/cultural history, focusing on radicalism. It seems absurd to me that PhD students all over the world are reading a lot of the same books for their comprehensive exams, in a vacuum. Even in my own department, none of us know what the others are doing, once we've taken the obligatory couple of seminars. There's not need to be so cagey -- our ideas at this point just aren’t that precious that they need to be kept secret. So I thought I’d “go first” and start posting the titles I'm reading and my reactions to them. My third field is rural history (which I plan to show fits well with these two); that’s documented at ruralhistory.net.

So, what is radicalism? What did people (intellectuals, but also regular people) think was radical, at different times? Why did they become (or oppose) radicals? What did they have in common with radicals in other times and places, and what was unique and local about their radicalism? How, for example, did some of them go on to become libertarians, while others became socialists? Why were some atheists and others devoutly religious? Why were some utopians while others were anarchists?

I saw a definition recently in John Brewer’s Party Ideology and popular politics at the accession of George III. What makes someone a radical, Brewer says, is not a predetermined set of social or political demands (like the points of the Charter), but “any position which, if fulfilled, would undermine or overturn existing political authority.” I think this pretty well captures the idea that radicals are defined in the context of their times, and also by a desire to overturn part (but usually a substantial part) of the contemporary power structure.

So this is the blog part, where I talk about whatever comes to my mind. And here's the link to the Field Reading Lists.]]>